Virginia Lawyer VA Lawyer August 2019 : Page-24

Menu
  • Page View
  • Contents View
  • Issue List
  • Advertisers
  • Website

Cash Bail: A Second Jail for the Poor? by the Hon. Joseph A. Migliozzi Jr. and Heather A. Wong Introduction to Bail The framers of the United States Constitution were well acquainted with the ancient practice of bail when they drafted the Bill of Rights. Under the Eighth Amendment, “Excessive bail shall not be required, nor ex-cessive fi nes imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments infl icted.” 1 The bail clause prohibits bail that is exces-sive. Indeed, the framers’ main con-cern in drafting the bail clause was to safeguard against unreasonably high bail. The fundamental purpose of bail, which was to guarantee an accused’s appearance at trial, was uncontrover-sial in early America. Yet, the practice of bail is currently the subject of a nationwide debate. Hence, a persist-ing issue at the heart of current bail reform in the U.S. remains to be re-solved in Virginia: Should the accused who is unable to purchase his freedom with a bail payment be held in jail pending trial? 24 VIRGINIA LAWYER | August 2019 | Vol. 68 | CRIMINAL LAW SECTION History of Bail In order to understand current bail reform in the U.S., as well as signifi cant issues related to this element of criminal justice, it is essential to know the history of bail and “key themes” from that history. 2 Bail originated in order to solve an issue still confronted today—the need to balance the equities of the accused’s general right to pretrial freedom with society’s interests in preventing criminals from fl eeing and ensuring the punishment of wrongful acts. 3 Though U.S. legal tradition and ideals establish the importance of liberty before tri-al, it is worth noting the differences between past and current bail practice. 4 Modern U.S. bail law has “deep histori-cal roots” in Anglo-Saxon custom and law. 5 During the Anglo-Saxon period (410-1066) in England, bail originally developed as “a means of settling disputes peacefully.” 6 In addition, because “jail facilities were impractical,” Anglo-Saxon law allowed for the release of the accused 7 conditioned upon fi nding a surety who would assume responsibility for ensuring the defendant’s court appearance and who, otherwise, would agree to pay the victim the settled amount if the defendant absconded. 8 www.vsb.org Shutterstock.com

Issue Articles

Issue List

June 2021

April 2021

February 2021

VA Lawyer December 2020

VA Lawyer October 2020

VA Lawyer August 2020

VA Lawyer June 2020

VA Lawyer April 2020

VA Lawyer February 2020

VA Lawyer December 2019

VA Lawyer October 2019

VA Lawyer August 2019

VA Lawyer June 2019

VA Lawyer April 2019

VA Lawyer February 2019

VA Lawyer December 2018

VA Lawyer October 2018

VA Lawyer August 2018

VA Lawyer June 2018

VA Lawyer Apr 2018

VA Lawyer Feb 2018

VA Lawyer Dec 2017

VA Lawyer Oct 2017

VA Lawyer Aug 2017

VA Lawyer Jun 2017

VA Lawyer Apr 2017

VA Lawyer Feb 2017

VA Lawyer Dec 2016

VA Lawyer Oct 2016

VA Lawyer Aug 2016

VA Lawyer Jun 2016

VA Lawyer Apr 2016

VA Lawyer Feb 2016

VA Lawyer Dec 2015

VA Lawyer Oct 2015

VA Lawyer Aug 2015

VA Lawyer Jun 2015

VA Lawyer Apr 2015

VA Lawyer Feb 2015

VA Lawyer Dec 2014

VA Lawyer Oct 2014

VA Lawyer Aug 2014

VA Lawyer Jun-Jul 2014

VA Lawyer Apr 2014

VA Lawyer Feb 2014

VA Lawyer Dec 2013

VA Lawyer Oct 2013

VA Lawyer Jun-Jul 2013

VA Lawyer Apr 2013

VA Lawyer Feb 2013

VA Lawyer Dec 2012

VA Lawyer Oct 2012

VA Lawyer Jun-Jul 2012

VA Lawyer Apr 2012

VA Lawyer Feb 2012

VA Lawyer Dec 2011

VA Lawyer Oct 2011

Previous  Next


Library